- CII Staff
- Press Releases
Leading Investor Group Urges Companies to Commit to Long-Term Executive Compensation Council of Institutional Investors Board Appoints Amy Borrus to Succeed Ken Bertsch as Executive Director Media Advisory: CII Fall Conference, September 16-18, Minneapolis Council of Institutional Investors Responds to Business
Roundtable Statement on Corporate Purpose
Leading Investor Group Calls Out Directors Responsible for
Dual-Class Companies Without “Sunsets”
Leading Investor Group Petitions SEC to Require Clear Disclosure on CEO Pay Targets Council of Institutional Investors Says Lyft’s Planned Dual-Class Structure is Harmful to Investors Media Advisory
CII Spring Conference, March 4-6, Washington, D.C.
CII Statement on Share Buybacks CII Research and Education Fund Publishes
Guide to Disclosure of Board Evaluation Processes
Investor Group Applauds CommonSense Principles 2.0 CII Fall Conference, October 23-25, New York City Leading Investor Group Responds to President’s Tweet on Quarterly Financial Reporting Investor Group Responds to Wall Street Journal Editorial CII Applauds Shareholder Protections in House Bill CII Elects New Board, Names Florida SBA Executive
Director & CIO Ashbel Williams Chair
New Report Details Practical Steps Corporate Boards Can Take to Combat Sexual Harassment CII Applauds SEC Commissioner Jackson's Call for Listing Standards to Require Sunsets on Dual-Class Stock CII Spring Conference, March 12-14, Washington. D.C. CII Announces Advisory Council Members for 2018 CII Report Highlights Risks Associated with a Common Chinese Corporate Structure Institutional Investors Oppose Stitch Fix Dual-Class Structure but Welcome Sunset Provision Uber’s Governance — Investor Response Do Not Disadvantage US Investors on Research,
CII Asks SEC
CII Fall Conference, September 13-15, San Diego CII Welcomes S&P Dow Jones’ Decision to Ban New Multi-Class Companies from Key Stock Indexes CII Applauds FTSE Russell Decision to Set Voting Rights
Minimum for Inclusion on Indexes
Investor Group Urges Blue Apron to Ditch No-Vote Shares Institutional Investors Dismayed by House Passage of
Financial CHOICE Act
CII, Institutional Investors with $4+ Trillion in Assets Oppose
Anti-Shareholder Provisions of the CHOICE Act
- CII in the News
- Governance & Financial Information
- Join & Support
- Contact Us
CII Applauds Shareholder Protections in House Bill
Washington, D.C., July 17, 2018 — The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) issued a statement in response to House passage today of a bill, the JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2018 (S. 488), aimed at supporting small businesses’ access to capital.
"We are pleased that several investor protection provisions were included in today’s bipartisan bill" said CII Executive Director Ken Bertsch. "We are particularly supportive of two of the bills’ provisions, one affecting trading plans and the other providing more information about multi-class stock structures.”
The first provision would require the SEC to consider certain types of amendments to Rule 10b5-1, consistent with CII’s policies and its related 2012 SEC rulemaking petition. CII believes the amendments would help ensure that corporate insiders could not indirectly engage in illegal insider trading through changes to their trading plans.
The second provision included in the bill, which CII supports, would require public companies with multi-class share structures to make certain disclosures in proxy or consent solicitation materials. Those disclosures would shed more light on certain shareholders’ voting power, which CII views as an important supplement to amending existing U.S. stock exchange listing standards to require meaningful, time-based sunsets for newly listed companies with those structures.
With the bill now headed to the Senate, CII is hopeful that the legislation will remain bipartisan and free of amendments that would threaten fundamental shareholder protections. In that regard, CII strongly opposes any amendments to the bill that would create an intrusive new federal regulatory scheme for proxy advisors, which would inhibit the ability of shareowners to obtain timely, cost-effective, and independent research to assist in voting their shares responsibly.