- CII Staff
- Press Releases
Leading Investor Group Rebukes SEC for Proposed Rules That Undercut Critical Shareholder Rights Leading Investor Group Urges Companies to Commit to Long-Term Executive Compensation Council of Institutional Investors Board Appoints Amy Borrus to Succeed Ken Bertsch as Executive Director Media Advisory: CII Fall Conference, September 16-18, Minneapolis Council of Institutional Investors Responds to Business
Roundtable Statement on Corporate Purpose
Leading Investor Group Calls Out Directors Responsible for
Dual-Class Companies Without “Sunsets”
Leading Investor Group Petitions SEC to Require Clear Disclosure on CEO Pay Targets Council of Institutional Investors Says Lyft’s Planned Dual-Class Structure is Harmful to Investors Media Advisory
CII Spring Conference, March 4-6, Washington, D.C.
CII Statement on Share Buybacks CII Research and Education Fund Publishes
Guide to Disclosure of Board Evaluation Processes
Investor Group Applauds CommonSense Principles 2.0 CII Fall Conference, October 23-25, New York City Leading Investor Group Responds to President’s Tweet on Quarterly Financial Reporting Investor Group Responds to Wall Street Journal Editorial CII Applauds Shareholder Protections in House Bill CII Elects New Board, Names Florida SBA Executive
Director & CIO Ashbel Williams Chair
New Report Details Practical Steps Corporate Boards Can Take to Combat Sexual Harassment CII Applauds SEC Commissioner Jackson's Call for Listing Standards to Require Sunsets on Dual-Class Stock CII Spring Conference, March 12-14, Washington. D.C. CII Announces Advisory Council Members for 2018 CII Report Highlights Risks Associated with a Common Chinese Corporate Structure Institutional Investors Oppose Stitch Fix Dual-Class Structure but Welcome Sunset Provision Uber’s Governance — Investor Response Do Not Disadvantage US Investors on Research,
CII Asks SEC
CII Fall Conference, September 13-15, San Diego CII Welcomes S&P Dow Jones’ Decision to Ban New Multi-Class Companies from Key Stock Indexes CII Applauds FTSE Russell Decision to Set Voting Rights
Minimum for Inclusion on Indexes
Investor Group Urges Blue Apron to Ditch No-Vote Shares Institutional Investors Dismayed by House Passage of
Financial CHOICE Act
CII, Institutional Investors with $4+ Trillion in Assets Oppose
Anti-Shareholder Provisions of the CHOICE Act
- CII in the News
- Governance & Financial Information
- Join & Support
- Contact Us
CII Statement on Share Buybacks
Washington, D.C. Feb. 5, 2019 — Senators Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders raise important public policy issues in their Feb. 3, 2019, New York Times op-ed decrying the growth of stock buybacks. Wage growth, retirement security and reliable health care are urgent matters for policymakers to address. But they should not interfere with corporations’ decisions about how best to allocate their capital.
Tying companies’ hands on capital allocation could lead executives to pour money into wasteful businesses that falter or fail to create additional jobs. Lawmakers should be cautious on making it too difficult for companies to recycle excess cash back to investors. In many cases, that will be the optimal capital allocation decision. Those shareholders, after all, generally reinvest the cash in companies they believe hold promise, helping to fuel the growth of companies that are powering the U.S. economy.
There is no indication that companies that repurchase their own shares fail to invest in research, development, human capital or equipment. An August study by index provider MSCI Inc. of companies doing buybacks concluded, “We did not find any compelling evidence to indicate that these companies elected to buy back shares to the exclusion of investing in their own futures.”
In fact, S&P 500 R&D spending as a percentage of sales is the highest since 1990. R&D spending as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) is the highest since the U.S. government began tracking it in 1959.
Some buybacks are not appropriate. Companies should not repurchase their own shares to boost the stock price in the short-term—especially if CEO pay is linked to earnings per share or measures of capital efficiency, such as return on equity or return on assets, which are also are lifted when equity is reduced.
That is why CII advocates robust disclosure about the rationale for buybacks. The board of directors should discuss in the company’s proxy statement its review and approval process for share repurchase programs with creating long-term value in mind. We also think management should disclose how buybacks affect performance metrics, perhaps in a table showing how the company would have performed absent a change in the number of shares outstanding.
Click for PDF version. For media inquiries, please contact CII Editor Rosemary Lally.