- About CII
- Board of Directors
- U.S. Asset Owners Advisory Council
- Corporate Governance Advisory Council
- Markets Advisory Council
- Committees
- CII Staff
- Press Releases
CII Elects Board Members for 2023-2024 Leading Investor Group Spring Conference,
March 6-8, Washington, D.C.CII Hails SEC for Closing Rule 10b5-1 Insider Trading Loopholes Leading Investor Group Fall Conference
September 21-23, BostonCII Elects Board Members for 2022-2023 - Members Also Approve Revised Policies on Poison Pills and Shareholder Meetings CII Spring Conference, March 7-9, Washington, D.C. Leading Investor Group Hails SEC Rule Requiring Universal Proxy Cards in Contests for Board Seats CII Virtual Fall Conference, September 22-24 CII Elects Board Members for 2021-2022 CII Virtual Spring Conference, March 8-10 SEC Muzzles the Voice of Investors by Raising the Bar on Shareholder Proposals Leading Investor Group Seeks Strengthened Sustainability Reporting CII Virtual Fall Conference, September 17-22 Leading Investor Group Dismayed by SEC Proxy Advice Rules Leading Investor Group Calls for Action on Racism Amy Borrus to Become Executive Director of the
Council of Institutional Investors on July 1CII Statement on Virtual Shareholder Meetings During Public Health Emergency CII Elects Board Members for 2020-2021, Approves Three Policies CII Spring Conference, March 9-11, Washington, D.C. Leading Investor Group Blasts SEC’s Proposed Rules for Proxy Advice and Shareholder Proposals CII Announces Advisory Council Members for 2020 Leading Investor Group Rebukes SEC for Proposed Rules That Undercut Critical Shareholder Rights Leading Investor Group Urges Companies to Commit to Long-Term Executive Compensation Council of Institutional Investors Board Appoints Amy Borrus to Succeed Ken Bertsch as Executive Director Media Advisory: CII Fall Conference, September 16-18, Minneapolis Council of Institutional Investors Responds to Business
Roundtable Statement on Corporate PurposeLeading Investor Group Calls Out Directors Responsible for
Dual-Class Companies Without “Sunsets”Leading Investor Group Petitions SEC to Require Clear Disclosure on CEO Pay Targets Council of Institutional Investors Says Lyft’s Planned Dual-Class Structure is Harmful to Investors Media Advisory
CII Spring Conference, March 4-6, Washington, D.C.CII Statement on Share Buybacks CII Research and Education Fund Publishes
Guide to Disclosure of Board Evaluation ProcessesInvestor Group Applauds CommonSense Principles 2.0 CII Fall Conference, October 23-25, New York City Leading Investor Group Responds to President’s Tweet on Quarterly Financial Reporting Investor Group Responds to Wall Street Journal Editorial CII Applauds Shareholder Protections in House Bill CII Elects New Board, Names Florida SBA Executive
Director & CIO Ashbel Williams ChairNew Report Details Practical Steps Corporate Boards Can Take to Combat Sexual Harassment CII Applauds SEC Commissioner Jackson's Call for Listing Standards to Require Sunsets on Dual-Class Stock CII Spring Conference, March 12-14, Washington. D.C. CII Announces Advisory Council Members for 2018 CII Report Highlights Risks Associated with a Common Chinese Corporate Structure Institutional Investors Oppose Stitch Fix Dual-Class Structure but Welcome Sunset Provision Uber’s Governance — Investor Response Do Not Disadvantage US Investors on Research,
CII Asks SECCII Fall Conference, September 13-15, San Diego CII Welcomes S&P Dow Jones’ Decision to Ban New Multi-Class Companies from Key Stock Indexes CII Applauds FTSE Russell Decision to Set Voting Rights
Minimum for Inclusion on IndexesInvestor Group Urges Blue Apron to Ditch No-Vote Shares Institutional Investors Dismayed by House Passage of
Financial CHOICE ActCII, Institutional Investors with $4+ Trillion in Assets Oppose
Anti-Shareholder Provisions of the CHOICE Act
- CII in the News
- Governance & Financial Information
- Contact Us
- CII Research and Education Fund
Leading Investor Group Hails SEC Rule Requiring Universal Proxy Cards in Contests for Board Seats
Washington, D.C., Nov. 17, 2021 — The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) applauds the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for today finalizing a rule requiring universal proxies in contested elections for seats on public company boards.
“This should be called ‘the investor choice rule,’” said Amy Borrus, CII’s executive director. “This small but significant reform ensures that investors voting by proxy card—as the vast majority of institutional and individual investors do—can vote for whichever combination of director nominees they think best serves their interests.”
The new rule’s origins go back to a CII rulemaking petition filed in 2014, in keeping with CII’s member-approved policy endorsing universal proxy cards in contested elections at U.S. public companies.
Until now, when there was a contest for board seats, typically over a dispute between the current board and an activist investor involving the company’s direction, most shareholders have not had full flexibility to "split their ticket." That’s because neither company management nor dissidents were required to include all bona fide candidates on their separate proxy cards. Typically, each card has presented a specific slate of preferred nominees.
“Imagine if, in a political election, you could vote only for Democrats or only for Republicans,” said Borrus. “That has been the dilemma facing most investors voting in a proxy contest at U.S. companies.”
To have real choice in a contested election, shareholders generally have had to vote in person at the annual shareholder meeting. But that is costly and time-consuming for many institutional and retail investors.
By mandating universal proxies in contests for board seats, the SEC is simply giving investors who vote by proxy the same choice they would get if they voted in person.
Electing the directors who represent them is a fundamental right of shareholders. It is especially critical when there is a contest among director nominees. Contested elections are pivotal events for companies and their shareholders because board seats, and in some cases, board control, are at stake.
There is no compelling evidence that universal proxy cards would encourage more proxy contests or favor dissidents. The rule does not eliminate the substantial cost and risk associated with waging a dissident campaign.
What the rule does do is 1) let shareholders choose from among all board nominees for the combination they believe best serves their interests, and 2) reduce the costs for shareholders who want to split their votes.
“This should be called ‘the investor choice rule,’” said Amy Borrus, CII’s executive director. “This small but significant reform ensures that investors voting by proxy card—as the vast majority of institutional and individual investors do—can vote for whichever combination of director nominees they think best serves their interests.”
The new rule’s origins go back to a CII rulemaking petition filed in 2014, in keeping with CII’s member-approved policy endorsing universal proxy cards in contested elections at U.S. public companies.
Until now, when there was a contest for board seats, typically over a dispute between the current board and an activist investor involving the company’s direction, most shareholders have not had full flexibility to "split their ticket." That’s because neither company management nor dissidents were required to include all bona fide candidates on their separate proxy cards. Typically, each card has presented a specific slate of preferred nominees.
“Imagine if, in a political election, you could vote only for Democrats or only for Republicans,” said Borrus. “That has been the dilemma facing most investors voting in a proxy contest at U.S. companies.”
To have real choice in a contested election, shareholders generally have had to vote in person at the annual shareholder meeting. But that is costly and time-consuming for many institutional and retail investors.
By mandating universal proxies in contests for board seats, the SEC is simply giving investors who vote by proxy the same choice they would get if they voted in person.
Electing the directors who represent them is a fundamental right of shareholders. It is especially critical when there is a contest among director nominees. Contested elections are pivotal events for companies and their shareholders because board seats, and in some cases, board control, are at stake.
There is no compelling evidence that universal proxy cards would encourage more proxy contests or favor dissidents. The rule does not eliminate the substantial cost and risk associated with waging a dissident campaign.
What the rule does do is 1) let shareholders choose from among all board nominees for the combination they believe best serves their interests, and 2) reduce the costs for shareholders who want to split their votes.
###
Click for PDF version. For media inquiries, please contact CII Editor Rosemary Lally.